COMMUNICATION IN A MULTICULTURAL FLIGHT DECK ENVIRONMENT: THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE DIMENSIONS IN COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS

Autores

  • Lucas Alkimin ASSIS Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil
  • Aline PACHECO Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil

Palavras-chave:

Dimensões culturais, Funções comunicativas, Comunicação, Interação multicultural

Resumo

Interações multiculturais entre pilotos tornaram-se mais comuns à medida que empresas aéreas precisaram recorrer à mão de obra de diversos países. Consequentemente, problemas relacionados à comunicação manifestam-se. Por meio de um estudo qualitativo e descritivo, este artigo tem como objetivo identificar quais funções comunicativas podem ser afetadas na comunicação de pilotos com nacionalidades diferentes, a partir da compreensão da influência de dimensões culturais. Através de uma revisão bibliográfica, propõe-se uma discussão sobre como a cultura nacional afeta a comunicação de pilotos. A partir de associações entre funções comunicativas - estabelecidas no DOC 9835 (ICAO 2010), e as dimensões culturais apontadas por Hofstede (1997), pode-se observar que a forma como pilotos expressam determinadas classes de funções comunicativas são afetadas pela cultura nacional. Sugere-se que os requerimentos de proficiência linguística observem tais aspectos, bem como treinamento linguístico que aborde essas questões e mais pesquisas considerando cultura, segurança de voo e comunicação.

Referências

BJELLOS, D. M. 2012. Multicultural CRM. Flight Safety Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Disponível em: https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/multicultural-crm/. Retrieved on 1 set. 2019.

BOCORNY, A. E. P. 2008. Descrição das unidades especializadas poliléxicas nominais no âmbito da aviação : subsídios para o ensino de inglês para fins específicos (ESP). Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS.

CHENG, Z. 2014. Intercultural Communication Difficulties and their Effects on Flight Safety. Tese (Doutorado) University Of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä. Available at https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/46429. Retrieved on 10 nov. 2018.

ENGLE, M. 2000. Culture in the Cockpit – CRM in a Multicultural World, Houston. Journal of Air Transportation World Wide, Omaha, NE, v. 5, n. 1, p. 107-114.

FISCHER, U.; J. ORASANU. 1999. Cultural Diversity and Crew Communication. In: ASTRONAUTICAL CONGRESS, 50th, 1999, Amsterdam. Congress Proceedings […]. Amsterdam: American Institute of Astronautics and Astronautics.

FISCHER, U.; J. ORASANU; J. DAVISON. 1997.Cross-Cultural Barriers to Effective Communication in Aviation. In: S. OSKAMP; C. GRANROSE. (eds.). Cross-Cultural

Work Groups: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, p. 134-157

FLIN, R.; P. O’CONNOR; M. CRICHTON. 2008. Safety at the Sharp End: a Guide to non-technical Skills. Surrey: Crc Press.

GIL, A. C.2008. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa Social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

GUDYKUNST, W. B.; NISHIDA, T. 2001.Anxiety, uncertainty, and perceived effectiveness of communication across relationships and cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Keaau, HI, v. 25, n. 1, p. 55-71. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0147176700000420. Retrieved on 10 nov. 2019.

HELMREICH, R. L; J. R. KLINEC; J. A. WILHELM. 1999. Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AVIATION PSICHOLOGY, 10th. Proceedings […]. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University 1999. p. 677-682. Available at https://flightsafety.org/files/models_of_threat_error.pdf. Retrieved on 8 nov. 2019.

HELMREICH, R. L.; A. C. MERRITT. 1998.National Culture. In: R. L HELMREICH; A. C. MERRITT. Culture at Work in Aviation and Medicine: National, Organizational and Professional Influences. Aldershot: Ashgate.

HELMREICH, R. L.; J.A WILHELM; J. R. KLINECT; A. C. MERRITT. 2000. Culture, Error, and Crew Resource Management. In: E. SALAS; C. A. BOWERS; E.

EDENS. (eds.). Applying Resource Management in Organizations: A Guide for Professionals. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4774/aa3e3ef2283638ff41a96cb864115e1f94bf.pdf. Retrieved on 23 jun. 2019.

HOFSTEDE, G. 1997. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill.

HOFSTEDE, G. [2010?]. The 6-D model of national culture. Available at

https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-nationalculture/. Retrieved on 20 may. 2019.

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION. 2010. Manual on the implementation of ICAO language proficiency requirements. 2. ed. Montreal: ICAO,. Doc 9835. Available at https://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2497.pdf. Retrieved on 5 abr. 2019.

JAKOBSON, R.; WAUGH, R. L.; MONVILLE-BURSTON, M. 1990. On Language.

London: Harvard University Press.

LINDE, C. 1988. The Quantitative Study of Communicative Success: Politeness and

Accidents in Aviation Discourse. Language in Society, New York, NY, v. 17, n. 3, p.

-399. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/4167952?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Retrieved on 8 nov. 2019.

McALLISTER, B. 1997. Crew Resource Management: Awareness, Cockpit Efficiency & Safety. Shrewsbury: Airlife.

MERRIT, A. C.; R. L. HELMREICH. 1996. Human Factors on the Flight Deck: The Influence of National Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Western Washington university, v. 27, n.1, p. 5-24.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. 1982. Air Florida, Inc. Boeing 737-222, N62AF, Collision with 14TH Street Bridge, Near Washington National Airport, Washington, D.C. Report no. AAR-82-8. Washington. Available at https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Pages/AAR8208.aspx. Retrieved on 10 nov. 2019.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. 2000. Controlled Flight into Terrain, Korean Air Flight 801, Boeing 747-300, HL7468 Nimitz Hill, Guam . Report no. AAR-00/01. Washington,. Available at https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR0001.pdf. Retrieved on 12 nov.2019.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. 2014. Descent Below Visual Glidepath and Impact With Seawall, Asiana Airlines Flight 214, Boeing 777-200ER, HL7742 San Francisco, California July 6, 2013: Report no. AAR-14/0. Washington.

Available at https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1401.pdf. Retrieved on 7 nov. 2019.

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD. 1979. United Airlines, INC. McDonnell-Douglas, DC-8-61, N8082U Portland, Oregon December 28, 1978: Report no.AAR-79-7. Available at https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR7907.pdf. Retrieved on 10 nov. 2019.

OXFORD REFERENCE LIBRARY. Entry: Cultural Relativism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2019. Available at https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095652905. Retrieved on 13 jun. 2019.

ROSADO, C. 1996.Toward a Definition of Multiculturalism. [S. l.]: Change in Human Systems,. Available at https://www.academia.edu/777187/Toward_a_Definition_of_Multiculturalism. Retrieved on 24 set. 2019.

TURNEY, M. A.; R. F. MAXANT. 2004.Tapping Diverse Talent: A Must for the New Century. In: TURNEY, M. A. Tapping Diverse Talent in Aviation. Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 3-10.

WELFERMAN, L. 2015. Crossing Cultures: National Norms and Customs Play a Role in Defining Aircraft Operators’ Safety Cultures. Flight Safety Foundation, Alexandria, VA. Available at https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/crossing-cultures/. Retrieved on 7 nov. 2019.

Downloads

Publicado

21/12/2020

Como Citar

ASSIS, L. A. ., & PACHECO, A. (2020). COMMUNICATION IN A MULTICULTURAL FLIGHT DECK ENVIRONMENT: THE INFLUENCE OF CULTURE DIMENSIONS IN COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS. evista BTecLE, 4(1), 441–462. ecuperado de https://revista.cbtecle.com.br/index.php/CBTecLE/article/view/258

Edição

Seção

Artigos