Board Games – Learners Produce Their Tests

Authors

  • Zenaide MOSCHIM GIANINI Fatec Araras, Araras/SP, Brasil

Keywords:

Speaking assessment, Teaching speaking, Learner’s autonomy

Abstract

This article presents the results of an experiment carried out with adult learners of English at Fatec Mogi Mirim in 2013, aimed at solving two problems found in this teaching setting: the difficulty of evaluating oral acquisition and production and the low engagement of students with their own learning. The students produced board games to review class contents and used them as a tool to assess their speaking at the end of the term. The sessions were recorded for later transcription and analysis of the data. The study is based on the concepts of "learner autonomy" by Holec (1981), Luoma's (2005) contributions on the assessment of oral comprehension/production, and Thornbury's (2005) contribution to teaching oral production. The results indicate an improvement of rapport among students and an increase in self-learning apart from revealing points to adjust and hence, to improve the communicative teaching practice, justifying the research.

References

ANDRADE, H. G. 1997. Understanding rubrics. Educational leadership, 54.4: 14-17.

ASAD, E. M. M., HASSAN, R. B., SHERWANI, E. F. 2014. Instructional Models For

Enhancing The Performance Of Students And Workforce During Educational Training. Academy Arena, 6.3: 27-31.

BENSON, P. & VOLLER, P. 2014. Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. In: BREEN, M. P. (Ed.) Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research. Routledge.

BORG, S., AL-BUSAIDI, S. 2012. Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. ELT Journal, 12.7: 1-45.

COUNCIL, OF EUROPE. 2000. European language portfolio (ELP): principles and guidelines.

GAER, S. 1998. Less teaching and more learning. Focus on Basic Connecting Research & Practice, 2.

HOLEC, H. 1979. Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

KISHIMOTO, T. M. 1996. Jogo, brinquedo, brincadeira e a educação. Cortez, São Paulo.

KRAJKA, J. 2016. Using the Internet in ESL writing instruction. The Internet TESL

Journal, 6.11, 2000. Disponível em:http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krajkahttp://iteslj.org/Techniques/Krajka-WritingUsingNetWritingUsingNet. Acesso em 15 jul. 2017.

LITTLE, D. 2006. Learner autonomy: Drawing together the threads of self-assessment, goal-setting and reflection. European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML, Hrsg.), Training teachers to use the European Language Portfolio.

LITTLE, D. & L. 1998. Dam. Learner autonomy: What and why? The Language Teacher_Kyoto-JALT, 22: 7-8.

LUOMA, S. 2005. Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MIRANDA, S. 2001. No Fascínio do jogo, a alegria de aprender. In: Ciência Hoje, 28:

-66.

PRENSKY, M. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, MCB University Press, 9.5.

REINDERS, H. 2010. Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones in the Language Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 3. UK.

SCRIVENER, J. 2005. Learning Teaching (2nd Edition), Macmillan.

VAN LIER, L. 1996. Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Authenticity, Autonomy. New York and London.

VERHELST, N. et al. 2009. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

THANASOULAS, D. 2000. What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered. The Internet TESL Journal, 6.11: 37-48. Disponível em:

http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html. Acesso em 15 jul.2016.

THORNBURY, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. Harlow: Pearson.

Published

2019-07-12

How to Cite

GIANINI, Z. M. (2019). Board Games – Learners Produce Their Tests . evista BTecLE, 3(1), 120–136. etrieved from https://revista.cbtecle.com.br/index.php/CBTecLE/article/view/112019181