Coarticulatory phenomena analysis in English based on the articulatory phonology

Authors

  • Amaury Flávio SILVA Faculdade de Tecnologia de Jacareí, Jacareí, Brasil

Keywords:

Coarticulation, Perception, Production, Articulatory phonology

Abstract

During the speech production process, native speakers of English tend to coarticulate the phonemic segments that comprise the words so that a reduction in the movement of the articulators takesplace. Such reduction modifies the phonemic segment productioncausing perception difficulties by Brazilian learners of English.Furthermore, these learners hyperarticulate segments thatare usually reduced by native speakers, which causes a greater articulatory effort and hampers the segment production. Due to these factors, we have carried out a study to investigate the coarticulatory effects that exist in the English language speech production based on the articulatory phonology. The study revealed that the native speaker of English used a strategy characterized by not including a pause between the words in the contextswhich were analyzed and by using the strategies called blending andhiding.

References

ALAMEEN, G.; LEVIS, J. Connected Speech. In:LEVIS, J.; REED, M.(Ed.) The Handbook of English Pronunciation. New Jersey, USA: Wiley Blackwell, 2015, p. 159-174.ALBANO, E.C. O gesto e suas bordas: esboço de uma fonologia acústico-articulatória do português brasileiro. São Paulo, Campinas: Mercado de Letras: Associação de Leitura do Brasil –ALB, Fapesp, 2001

BOERSMA, P., WEENINK, D.Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Versão 6.0.39, Amsterdã, Universidade de Amsterdã, 2018.BROWN, G. Listening to spoken English. London: Longman, 1977.

BROWMAN, C. P., GOLDSTEIN, LTowards an articulatory phonology. Phonology, v. 3, 1986, p. 219-252.___________. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, v. 6, 1989, p. 201-251.___________. Gestural specification using dynamically defined articulatory gestures. Journal of Phonetics, v. 18, 1990a, p. 299-320.___________. Tiers in articulatory phonology with some implicants for casual speech. In: KINGSTON, J.;

BECKMAN, M. E. (Ed.). Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, Cambridge, RU: Cambridge University Press, p. 341-376, 1990b___________. Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica, v. 49, 1992, p. 155-180.

CHOMSKY, N. Syntatic Structures. Berlin and New York: The Hague: Mouton, 1985. [1957], Data de publicação original.

FARNETANI, E.; RECASENS, D. Coarticulationmodels in recent speech production theories. In: HARDCASTLE, W.J.; NIGEL, H. (Ed.). Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge, RU: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 1-31FIELD, J. Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on? TESOL Quarterly, 2008, p. 411–432.

REED, M., MICHAUD, C. Sound concepts: An integrated pronunciation course. New 26 York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.

SALTZMAN, E.; L. GOLDSTEIN; C. P. BROWMAN; P. E. RUBIN. Dynamics of gestural blending during speech production. Paper presented at 1STANNUAL INTERNATIONAL NEURALNETWORK SOCIETY(INNS), Boston, 1988.

SHOCKEY, L. Phonetic and Phonological properties of connected speech. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics, v. 17, 1974, p. iv-143.

SILVA, A., F. Contrastes entre estratégias de falantes bilíngues na produção de um diálogo e um monólogo em inglês. Dissertação de Mestrado, PUC-SP,2009

_______ Percepção de reduções em inglêscomo L2. Tese de Doutorado, PUC-SP,2016

Published

2021-07-12

How to Cite

SILVA, A. F. . (2021). Coarticulatory phenomena analysis in English based on the articulatory phonology. evista BTecLE, 5(1), 002–015. etrieved from https://revista.cbtecle.com.br/index.php/CBTecLE/article/view/353